Expert #12: bounded request-classification substrate #27
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
accessibility
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
nsaspy/llm-log!27
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "rage/12-request-classifier-red"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Supersedes draft PR #26 only because the connected ready-for-review transition is unavailable. #26 had zero submitted reviews and zero conversation comments, so no review/discussion history is discarded.
Consumes the first bounded implementation slice of #12 under #8.
Canonical ARADR:
research/LLM-LOG-RESEARCH-036-request-classification-expert.org.Implementation evidence:
evidence/LLM-LOG-EVIDENCE-017-request-classifier-red-green.org.Executed RED: exact head
f5e15c2f1fbd8800d767ab8eb701f353ab151668, hosted run 33371681379.Exact current GREEN:
7d89fffd1158e1d7816fdb09010c15b2a39e629d, hosted run 33376862930; Common Lisp/Tek9/SWI-Prolog, Python expert-policy, and Home Manager gates all passed.Architecture remains Python capture/transport -> Common Lisp expert runtime -> bounded Tek9 + SWI-Prolog. Rules live in SWI-Prolog; Common Lisp validates typed inputs/results and persists exact source plus derived assertions. No Python rule engine, arbitrary Prolog callable term, whole-corpus materialization, authority escalation, Tek9 repository mutation, or dotfiles consumer mutation is included.
This does not close #12: explicit ambiguity coverage and bounded indexed query acceptance by request/user-message/provider/model/time remain follow-up #12 work.
maincurrently reportsprotected=false, required status checks off, and repository rulesets are empty. This PR has no inherited review requirement; zero reviews must not be described as approval. PR #5 remains separate.