P0 research gate — Samsung assistant role and Android integration architecture #195

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-08-24 06:24:49 +00:00 by lost-rob0t · 0 comments

lost-rob0t commented

2026-08-24 06:24:49 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Parent: #194
Depends on: #170
Integrates with: #132, #133, #134, #150, #151, #152, #159, #170-#179

Goal

Extend the existing Android feasibility decision with current authoritative research for a Samsung Galaxy system-assistant product before production implementation begins.

Required research

Use primary/current sources and record exact versions, dates, API levels, device assumptions, and unresolved hardware questions for:

Android Assistant role eligibility, RoleManager behavior, VoiceInteractionService and VoiceInteractionSessionService;
manifest and voice-interaction metadata;
Samsung Digital-assistant selection and Side-button behavior on supported One UI releases;
background-process, foreground-service, microphone, wake-word, audio-focus and Bluetooth/headset restrictions;
Jetpack Compose, Material 3, Kotlin, Gradle, Android Gradle Plugin, SDK and NDK version pins;
package visibility and typed application launching;
URI/browser/YouTube/ChatGPT handoff contracts;
AlarmClock and Calendar provider/intents;
Termux RUN_COMMAND and result/permission contracts;
SmartThings API Access Apps, OAuth, REST, subscriptions and signed lifecycle webhooks;
Play-distribution and sideload constraints relevant to assistant/Termux behavior.

Design output

Record the chosen architecture, rejected alternatives, ownership boundaries, lifecycle/state machines, threat analysis, capability schema, package layout, dependency/version pins, test mapping, hardware test matrix, and exact CI/Nix/Gradle gates in repository RAGE artifacts.

The decision must preserve the existing ZARA/1 runtime, Prolog semantic vocabulary, principal, conversations, memory, capability registry, and programmable-command architecture.

Security invariants

No arbitrary Intent plane, remote shell, AccessibilityService automation, reflection/dynamic invocation, raw Prolog goal execution, or client-owned SmartThings credential authority.

Acceptance

Auto-RAGE Analyze/Design/Adversarial review/Decision evidence is complete.
Every #194 acceptance criterion maps to an owning issue and deterministic or explicitly human test.
Unknown Samsung behaviors remain marked unverified, never inferred.
No production implementation begins before the decision record is accepted by Auto-RAGE.

Parent: #194 Depends on: #170 Integrates with: #132, #133, #134, #150, #151, #152, #159, #170-#179 ## Goal Extend the existing Android feasibility decision with current authoritative research for a Samsung Galaxy system-assistant product before production implementation begins. ## Required research Use primary/current sources and record exact versions, dates, API levels, device assumptions, and unresolved hardware questions for: - Android Assistant role eligibility, RoleManager behavior, VoiceInteractionService and VoiceInteractionSessionService; - manifest and voice-interaction metadata; - Samsung Digital-assistant selection and Side-button behavior on supported One UI releases; - background-process, foreground-service, microphone, wake-word, audio-focus and Bluetooth/headset restrictions; - Jetpack Compose, Material 3, Kotlin, Gradle, Android Gradle Plugin, SDK and NDK version pins; - package visibility and typed application launching; - URI/browser/YouTube/ChatGPT handoff contracts; - AlarmClock and Calendar provider/intents; - Termux RUN_COMMAND and result/permission contracts; - SmartThings API Access Apps, OAuth, REST, subscriptions and signed lifecycle webhooks; - Play-distribution and sideload constraints relevant to assistant/Termux behavior. ## Design output Record the chosen architecture, rejected alternatives, ownership boundaries, lifecycle/state machines, threat analysis, capability schema, package layout, dependency/version pins, test mapping, hardware test matrix, and exact CI/Nix/Gradle gates in repository RAGE artifacts. The decision must preserve the existing ZARA/1 runtime, Prolog semantic vocabulary, principal, conversations, memory, capability registry, and programmable-command architecture. ## Security invariants No arbitrary Intent plane, remote shell, AccessibilityService automation, reflection/dynamic invocation, raw Prolog goal execution, or client-owned SmartThings credential authority. ## Acceptance - Auto-RAGE Analyze/Design/Adversarial review/Decision evidence is complete. - Every #194 acceptance criterion maps to an owning issue and deterministic or explicitly human test. - Unknown Samsung behaviors remain marked unverified, never inferred. - No production implementation begins before the decision record is accepted by Auto-RAGE.