[EPIC][CORE-F] Federation + integrity + redaction: CLFM ledger federation, replica profiles, anti-entropy, GRIE lifecycle, retention, and remote obligations #32
Labels
No labels
accessibility
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
nsaspy/symbolic-memory#32
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Parent: #11
Research: prolog-rlm#402B/#402C/#402D
Goal
Implement multi-ledger durability and governance without pretending all memories share one clock, authority domain, trust domain, or retention policy.
Own:
Hard invariants
Acceptance
Partition/rejoin, mirror/replica, fork, remote-unavailable, redaction, and replay fixtures preserve exact status; anti-entropy does not duplicate evidence; a source ledger cannot falsely claim federation-wide deletion or global serializability.
Machine Spirit #405C / CONCORDAT federation hardening
CONCORDAT confirms this epic's premise and adds explicit domain contracts above CLFM ledger links.
Federation must preserve separate:
A CLFM ledger relationship alone does not imply semantic compatibility or trust. Cross-domain import requires a directional/versioned federation contract plus target-local appraisal. No ambient transitive trust, no merged trust bundles, no invented global order, and no replica amplification of evidence.
Suggested durable refs for imported records: source domain/ledger/object/frontier, contract version, mapping generations, source trust-root generation, target appraisal receipt, origin/dependence state, redaction obligations.
Canonical research + C14-C26/C37-C44: lost-rob0t/prolog-rlm#405C.